Following Ban, Flipper Zero Creators Say They’re Being Scapegoated for Car Thefts

The Flipper Zero has been under examination ever since last month when Canadian officials claimed that it was to pick for a cost increase in car thefts in the country and proposed a ban on the popular ( and cheap ) penetration - testing equipment .

This week , the multi - tools ’ developerspublished a statementon their situation arguing that they have been below the belt singled out as the hacker boogeymen behind Canada ’s railroad car larceny job . They also root on entanglement users tosign a petitiondenouncing the declare oneself Flipper ban . “ We think that proposals like this are harmful to security and slow down technological progress , ” the situation take . “ They are usually made by those who do not really understand how security works and will do nothing to solve the car theft trouble . ”

In February , the Canadian Minister of Public Safety ’s officesaid it would pursue“all avenues to shun machine used to steal fomite by re-create the wireless signal for distant keyless entry , such as the Flipper Zero . ” The statement came directly after a crown focused on “ find resolution to the turn challenge of auto thievery in Canada . ” Canadian officials have insisted that the Flipper is one of the primary offenders when it comes to the thieving of keyless elevator car in the nation .

Photo: Shutterstock-Pixelsquid (Shutterstock)

Meanwhile , Alex Kulagin , the COO of Flipper Devices , has claimed that the gadget “ ca n’t be used to commandeer any car . ” In their blog , the Flipper ’s developer note that there are tool that are specifically made for part into keyless gondola system — what are known as “ signal repeaters”—that you’re able to freely purchase online . Such tools will bug signals sent by a elevator car ’s key fob and relay them to a hacker ’s twist , allowing for the remote entry into and activation of the fomite . The Flipper , conversely , does not have the same kind of computing power as these devices and is a less practical choice of creature for such an try , the developer argue .

The developer also doubled down on an disputation they ’ve previously made , which is that government official should be more interested in regulating the technical school industry to make wide used software package more secure rather than punishing people who poke hole in industriousness defenses .

“ Instead of ban cybersecurity tools adequate to of finding vulnerabilities in security measure system of rules , these vulnerabilities must be fixed , ” the command reads . “ The cybersecurity industriousness has long recognized that bans do not ready insecure systems , but instead only cause more problem by creating a false picture that proper measures have been take . ”

Ankerprimecharger240w